An action is not given to one who is not injured. Snowden is not injured, We can think over the main reason: Why did Edward do that? Did he exchange the secret information to get money or something else…?

An action is not given to one who is not injured. Snowden is not injured, We can think over the main reason: Why did Edward do that? Did he exchange the secret information to get money or something else…?

An action is not given to one who is not injured. Because we can see the Government did not have wrong-doings like: force Snowden corruption…

We can think over the main reason: Why did Edward do that? Did he exchange the secret information to get money or something else…?
Edward Snowden, Illegal immigrants should have to be deported!
An action is not given to one who is not injured. Because we can see the Government did not have wrong-doings like: force him corruption…
Edward cannot dissappear because maybe he can be a tooled person for China (for example)…And if having the Lawsuit, the court’s opinion was that the case should be heard inter parties as soon as possible.
If he dissappers, the court took the view that the defendant’s plea was equivocal. And finally, the Chinese court is not competent to try the case?

http://vnexpress.net/gl/the-gioi/2013/06/snowden-to-my-tan-cong-mang-trung-quoc/

The AP's Lawsuit was truck out because it disclosed no cause of action.
Pháp luật là phải có chứng cứ xác thực (ghi âm...) và nguồn căn. Tại sao vụ kiện AP có thể bị xóa bỏ?

Vì nó không chỉ ra ra được nguyên nhân của vụ kiện.

Solutions' Recommendation for AP Lawsuit.

The safety of the people is the supreme law.

Like reason makes like Law.

Let right be done, though the heavens fall.

1/. The Government has the Right to investigate somethings or someone suspected and to guarantee the people's life. They have the Right to govern if the AP has some equivocal denotations.

Chính phủ có quyền nghi ngờ và điều tra để bảo đảm mạng sống của người dân.

2/. In some force majeure cases...

3/. Every Law has no atom of strength, as far as no public opinion supports it.

-> Chừng nào chưa có sự ủng hộ của quần chúng thì chừng đó Luật pháp vẫn chưa có hiệu lực.

We can show the ethics about the felonious terrorists killing innocent people to the forum to get the reaction of people...

4/. The accessory is delinquency.

http://thaihien88.blogspot.com/2013/05/except-as-otherwise-provided-by-law_8.html

Vụ xâm phạm thông tin của AP: Nghị sĩ hai Đảng chỉ trích nhà Trắng